Many thanks for your feedback on my draft micro teach session. I always welcome peer reflection šĀ Please feel free to take a look at my microteach session if you havenāt done so already as I would appreciate a second review!
One key point that I have actioned from initial peer feedback, was the recommendation to find out my studentās prior knowledge and experience with working with clay and plaster. In my draft, I had initially planned to do this as the students arrived, but from my peers advice I have emailed out a simple pre-class anonymous questionnaire (from surverymonkey) I also included a consent form so it will cover me for my filming for assessment.
This small change to my plan, allows me to not only update my ābackground of studentsā, āassumed prior knowledgeā and ādifferentiationā sections within my lesson plan. It also gives me the opportunity to adjust how the lesson flows according to the studentās results. The extra time which has been acquired from this removal of task, will grant me contingency time on the day and potential for SchÓ§nās (1983, 1987) āReflection in Actionā to occur (reflection while I am teaching).
Ā
Rushton, I.; Suter, M. (2012). Reflective practice for teaching in lifelong learning. McGraw-Hill Open University Press. Chapter 3: āLevels and models of reflective practiceā, pages 22-32 (ebook)

Comments